1952 Toyota SA vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Toyota SA would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Forte (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1952 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1952 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Forte weights approximately 58 kg more than 1952 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Toyota SA | 2010 Kia Forte | |
| Make | Toyota | Kia |
| Model | SA | Forte |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 993 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1228 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4529 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1775 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2649 mm |
