1952 Toyota SA vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Toyota SA would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo XC60 (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1952 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1952 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 751 kg more than 1952 Toyota SA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Toyota SA | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | SA | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 993 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1921 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2748 mm |
