1952 Toyota SA vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Toyota SA would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1952 Toyota SA. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 1952 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Toyota SA weights approximately 41 kg more than 2013 Kia RIO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Toyota SA | 2013 Kia RIO | |
| Make | Toyota | Kia |
| Model | SA | RIO |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 993 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1129 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4045 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2570 mm |
