1952 Triumph Renown vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (242 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Renown. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 670 kg more than 1952 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Tundra (426 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Renown. (147 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Triumph Renown | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Triumph | Toyota |
| Model | Renown | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 84 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3270 mm |
