1952 Triumph TR2 vs. 2009 Audi A3
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph TR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1952 Triumph TR2. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph TR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi A3 weights approximately 485 kg more than 1952 Triumph TR2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Triumph TR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Triumph TR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (200 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph TR2. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph TR2. 2009 Audi A3 has automatic transmission and 1952 Triumph TR2 has manual transmission. 1952 Triumph TR2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi A3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Triumph TR2 | 2009 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Triumph | Audi |
| Model | TR2 | A3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 92.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 11.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 55 L |
