1952 Triumph TR2 vs. 2013 Ford EDGE
To start off, 2013 Ford EDGE is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford EDGE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford EDGE (281 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1952 Triumph TR2. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph TR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford EDGE weights approximately 975 kg more than 1952 Triumph TR2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Triumph TR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Triumph TR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford EDGE, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford EDGE (343 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph TR2. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford EDGE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph TR2. 2013 Ford EDGE has automatic transmission and 1952 Triumph TR2 has manual transmission. 1952 Triumph TR2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford EDGE will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Triumph TR2 | 2013 Ford EDGE | |
| Make | Triumph | Ford |
| Model | TR2 | EDGE |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.1 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 1840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4679 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 2223 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1702 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2250 mm | 2824 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 68 L |
