1953 Abarth 103 GT vs. 1958 AC Aceca
To start off, 1958 AC Aceca is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Abarth 103 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Abarth 103 GT would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 AC Aceca (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1953 Abarth 103 GT. (63 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1953 Abarth 103 GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 AC Aceca weights approximately 66 kg more than 1953 Abarth 103 GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Abarth 103 GT | 1958 AC Aceca | |
Make | Abarth | AC |
Model | 103 GT | Aceca |
Year Released | 1953 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74.9 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 828 kg | 894 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 59 L |