1953 Abarth 103 GT vs. 1962 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1962 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Abarth 103 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Abarth 103 GT would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Abarth 103 GT (63 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Abarth 103 GT should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 202 kg more than 1953 Abarth 103 GT.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Abarth 103 GT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Abarth 103 GT | 1962 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Abarth | Jeep |
| Model | 103 GT | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1089 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 828 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2060 mm |
