1953 Abarth 103 GT vs. 1967 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1967 Cadillac Calais is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Abarth 103 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Abarth 103 GT would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1953 Abarth 103 GT. (63 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1953 Abarth 103 GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1162 kg more than 1953 Abarth 103 GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Abarth 103 GT | 1967 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
| Model | 103 GT | Calais |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1089 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 828 kg | 1990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 82 L |
