1953 Abarth 103 GT vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1967 Riley Kestrel is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Abarth 103 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Abarth 103 GT would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Abarth 103 GT (63 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Abarth 103 GT should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 60 kg more than 1953 Abarth 103 GT.
Because 1953 Abarth 103 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Abarth 103 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Abarth 103 GT | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Abarth | Riley |
Model | 103 GT | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1953 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 828 kg | 888 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 25 L |