1953 Abarth 103 GT vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Abarth 103 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Abarth 103 GT would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1953 Abarth 103 GT. (63 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1953 Abarth 103 GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Abarth 103 GT weights approximately 8 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Abarth 103 GT | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Abarth | Lotus |
Model | 103 GT | Elan |
Year Released | 1953 | 1968 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1089 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 828 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 59 L |