1953 AC 2-Litre vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 AC 2-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 AC 2-Litre would be higher. At 2,874 cc, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1953 AC 2-Litre. (76 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1953 AC 2-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 580 kg more than 1953 AC 2-Litre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (305 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 AC 2-Litre. (136 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 AC 2-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1953 AC 2-Litre | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | AC | SsangYong |
Model | 2-Litre | Rexton |
Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2874 cc |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1900 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 80 L |