1953 AC Ace vs. 1965 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 1965 Lancia Flavia is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lancia Flavia (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1953 AC Ace. (85 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 1953 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 388 kg more than 1953 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 AC Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 AC Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Lancia Flavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 AC Ace | 1965 Lancia Flavia | |
Make | AC | Lancia |
Model | Ace | Flavia |
Year Released | 1953 | 1965 |
Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 56 L |