1953 AC Ace vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 AC Ace (85 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 AC Ace weights approximately 22 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 AC Ace (149 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1953 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 AC Ace | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | AC | MCC |
| Model | Ace | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 1810 mm |
