1953 AC Ace vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 AC Ace would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (101 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1953 AC Ace. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1953 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 689 kg more than 1953 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 AC Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 AC Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 AC Ace | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | AC | Volvo |
Model | Ace | C30 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 762 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |