1953 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1984 Autobianchi A 112
To start off, 1984 Autobianchi A 112 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 740 kg more than 1984 Autobianchi A 112.
Because 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Autobianchi A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1984 Autobianchi A 112 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Autobianchi |
Model | 6C | A 112 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 963 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2050 mm |