1953 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1985 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1985 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 550 kg more than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1985 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 6C | Brougham |
Year Released | 1953 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3090 mm |