1953 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1995 Audi TT
To start off, 1995 Audi TT is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 180 kg more than 1995 Audi TT.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1995 Audi TT | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
| Model | 6C | TT |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 81.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2430 mm |
