1953 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1995 Daewoo No 1
To start off, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Daewoo No 1 has automatic transmission and 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Daewoo No 1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1995 Daewoo No 1 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Daewoo |
Model | 6C | No 1 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |