1953 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 750 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | MCC |
Model | 6C | Smart |
Year Released | 1953 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 53 HP |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1460 mm |