1953 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1998 Audi AD
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1998 Audi AD | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
Model | 6C | AD |
Year Released | 1953 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |