1953 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (187 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 690 kg more than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1999 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Land Rover |
Model | 6C | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1953 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2750 mm |