1953 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 1999 Seat Cordoba
To start off, 1999 Seat Cordoba is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Seat Cordoba (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | 1999 Seat Cordoba | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Seat |
| Model | 6C | Cordoba |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2520 mm |
