1953 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2000 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Dakota (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 130 kg more than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2000 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
Model | 6C | Dakota |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2850 mm |