1953 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2003 Ford Windstar is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Windstar (200 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | 6C | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3066 mm |
