1953 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 396 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 913 kg more than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
Model | 6C | Ram |
Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 8277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 500 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 101 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3070 mm |