1953 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Chevrolet Corvette
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 6,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Corvette (506 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 402 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 51 kg more than 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Chevrolet Corvette | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | 6C | Corvette |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 6998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 506 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 104.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2690 mm |
