1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1941 Cadillac 60
To start off, 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,672 cc (8 cylinders), 1941 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1941 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1941 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1941 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 574 kg more than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1941 Cadillac 60 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | AR 51 | 60 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1941 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 5672 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1824 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3230 mm |