1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1958 Cadillac 62 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 845 kg more than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | AR 51 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3300 mm |
