1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1980 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1980 Ford Falcon is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Ford Falcon (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Falcon weights approximately 120 kg more than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1980 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | AR 51 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1953 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 3273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |