1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 98 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | AR 51 | Cimarron |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1152 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2580 mm |
