1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 470 kg more than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | AR 51 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3270 mm |