1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2006 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1417 kg more than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 has manual transmission. 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2006 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | AR 51 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 5967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 91.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2667 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3310 mm |