1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 88 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volkswagen |
Model | AR 51 | Polo |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 184 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1162 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2470 mm |