1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2008 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Aveo (103 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 250 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2008 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | AR 51 | Aveo |
Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2490 mm |