1953 Allard J2 vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1953 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 211 kg more than 1953 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Allard J2 | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | J2 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1191 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 76 L |
