1953 Allard J2 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox (264 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1953 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 281 kg more than 1953 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Allard J2 | 2009 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
| Model | J2 | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 264 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1261 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 61 L |
