1953 Allard J2 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1953 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 726 kg more than 1953 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Allard J2 | 2010 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | J2 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5416 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1706 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2858 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 71 L |