1953 Allard J2 vs. 2012 Land Rover LR4
To start off, 2012 Land Rover LR4 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard J2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard J2 would be higher. At 5,416 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard J2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover LR4 (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1953 Allard J2. (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR4 should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard J2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover LR4 weights approximately 1568 kg more than 1953 Allard J2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Allard J2 | 2012 Land Rover LR4 | |
| Make | Allard | Land Rover |
| Model | J2 | LR4 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5416 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 375 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 2548 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4829 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1915 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1882 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2885 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 86 L |
