1953 Allard K3 vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 1958 Lotus 16 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1953 Allard K3. (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Allard K3 weights approximately 632 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Allard K3 | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
| Make | Allard | Lotus |
| Model | K3 | 16 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2260 mm |
