1953 Allard K3 vs. 1984 Audi 200
To start off, 1984 Audi 200 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Audi 200 weights approximately 78 kg more than 1953 Allard K3.
Because 1953 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Allard K3 | 1984 Audi 200 | |
Make | Allard | Audi |
Model | K3 | 200 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |