1953 Allard K3 vs. 1992 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 1992 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,373 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Allard K3 | 1992 Chrysler Voyager | |
Make | Allard | Chrysler |
Model | K3 | Voyager |
Year Released | 1953 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4373 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1680 mm |