1953 Allard K3 vs. 2001 Skoda Fabia

To start off, 2001 Skoda Fabia is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Skoda Fabia (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1953 Allard K3. (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Fabia should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard K3.

Because 1953 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Skoda Fabia (310 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Allard K3. (217 Nm). This means 2001 Skoda Fabia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Allard K3. 2001 Skoda Fabia has automatic transmission and 1953 Allard K3 has manual transmission. 1953 Allard K3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Skoda Fabia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: