1953 Allard K3 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Allard K3 (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 288 kg more than 1953 Allard K3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Allard K3 (217 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1953 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 1953 Allard K3 has manual transmission. 1953 Allard K3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Allard K3 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Allard | Suzuki |
Model | K3 | F1 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 45 L |