1953 Allard K3 vs. 2002 Toyota Pod

To start off, 2002 Toyota Pod is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Pod (194 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1953 Allard K3. (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Pod should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Allard K3 weights approximately 242 kg more than 2002 Toyota Pod.

Because 1953 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Pod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Pod (430 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Allard K3. (217 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Pod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Allard K3. 2002 Toyota Pod has automatic transmission and 1953 Allard K3 has manual transmission. 1953 Allard K3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Toyota Pod will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: