1953 Allard K3 vs. 2005 Ford Ikon
To start off, 2005 Ford Ikon is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,373 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ikon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Allard K3 | 2005 Ford Ikon | |
| Make | Allard | Ford |
| Model | K3 | Ikon |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4373 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |
