1953 Allard K3 vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 146 more horse power than 1953 Allard K3. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard K3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Allard K3. (217 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Allard K3.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Allard K3 | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Allard | Holden |
Model | K3 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |