1953 Allard K3 vs. 2009 BMW 328
To start off, 2009 BMW 328 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 BMW 328 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1953 Allard K3. (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard K3.
Because 2009 BMW 328 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 BMW 328 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 BMW 328 (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Allard K3. (217 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Allard K3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Allard K3 | 2009 BMW 328 | |
| Make | Allard | BMW |
| Model | K3 | 328 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 271 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 60 L |
