1953 Allard K3 vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Allard K3 | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K3 | E-150 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4373 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2619 mm |