1953 Allard K3 vs. 2010 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2010 Mercury Mariner is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercury Mariner (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1953 Allard K3. (94 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 333 kg more than 1953 Allard K3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Mariner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercury Mariner (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Allard K3. (217 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2010 Mercury Mariner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Allard K3. 2010 Mercury Mariner has automatic transmission and 1953 Allard K3 has manual transmission. 1953 Allard K3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mercury Mariner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Allard K3 | 2010 Mercury Mariner | |
Make | Allard | Mercury |
Model | K3 | Mariner |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4458 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1806 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 62 L |